Adventist News

  • Students Experience Learning, Worship and Adventure at Outdoor School
    –

    Students enjoyed a full week of learning, fellowship, worship and outdoor adventure during Outdoor School at Camp Heritage. Throughout the week, students spent their mornings engaged in hands-on classes designed to help them explore the world around them. Classes included Raptors, Weather and Watercolor, giving students opportunities to learn about nature, science and creativity in a fun outdoor setting. After working hard in their classes, students had the chance to play hard as well. Time at the waterfront was a highlight, giving everyone an opportunity to relax, have fun and enjoy the beautiful surroundings of Camp Heritage. The activities continued with a lively game of dodgeball led by Iowa-Missouri Conference president Pastor Lee Rochholz. Students then came together for worship with Pastor Anthony Rudalf, providing an opportunity to pause from the day’s activities and focus on their relationship with God. As the final full day at Camp Heritage came to a close, education superintendent Jovannah Poor Bear Adams reflected on the joy of spending the week with the students and the friendships built during their time together. While everyone was tired after several busy days, there was also excitement about the opportunities ahead. Teachers, students and education leaders will continue connecting and creating memories throughout the school year, with many looking forward to gathering together again at Music Fest.

    Read more...

  • Photo of several new PA students at Union Adventist University Union Adventist University Reports Highest Graduate Student Enrollment Ever High retention yields enrollment growth
    –

    Union’s headcount for the fall semester of 2026 is a strong 758 students — 10 more than last year! That’s 53 more than in 2022. This number is the result of exceptionally strong retention and growing graduate programs. This year has Union’s highest enrollment of master’s students ever. Graduate programs have shown steady growth with the numbers increasing every year for the last seven years. This year, 121 master’s students have chosen Union compared to 110 last year and 87 in 2020. That includes four public health students, seven leadership students, 14 occupational therapy students and 96 PA students. This year’s freshmen class is comparatively small, with 92 first-year students choosing Union. Some facts about Union’s new Class of 2030 include: They represent six countries. Nebraska and Minnesota are tied for the top two states with 13 students each. The gender ratio is 65% female to 35% male. 35% are first-generation college students. 79% attended Adventist academies and 5% were homeschooled. “I am rejoicing for every one of the 758 students God has sent us to mentor and guide this year,” said Yami Bazan, university president. “Our high retention and high student engagement tell a story: Union is not only the sort of place students want to come to, but a place they want to stay. I am thankful for all of our faculty and staff who work with such dedication to create our campus culture—the spirit of service, the joy of inquiry, the heart and soul they pour into this campus is seen and deeply appreciated. Our retention is strong because our students feel the love our employees have for them, for each other and for Jesus.” Scott Cushman is director of public relations at Union Adventist University.

    Read more...

  • From Business to Ministry, Daniel Silva Is Ordained
    –

    Daniel Silva’s move from a business career in Brazil to pastoral ministry was recognized Sept. 12, 2026, when he was ordained at College View Church in Lincoln, Nebraska. He has served as the church’s administrative pastor since 2023. Before entering ministry, Silva managed projects for large companies and later oversaw an investment portfolio. Leaving the security of that work was a difficult decision. As he sensed God calling him to become a pastor, Phil. 4:13 took on new meaning: “I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me.” His preparation began in the local church, where he served as a youth leader and volunteer Bible worker before becoming an evangelist. Silva and his wife, Carol, later moved to Berrien Springs, Michigan. There he earned a Master of Divinity at Andrews University, and the couple helped plant a Brazilian church. Silva joined the Kansas-Nebraska Conference in 2019, pastoring the Wichita Southeast, Wichita West Hispanic and Arkansas City Hispanic churches before moving to College View. Family also had a place in his ordination service. Carol and Nicole Silva provided special music, singing “Era a Mão de Deus.” Silva’s biography credits Carol, whom he married in 2010, with steady support as he followed his call. Nilton Garcia presented “A Ministry that Leaves Lasting Footprints,” and Simon Liversidge spoke on “A Man of God.” Conference president Ron Carlson offered the ordination prayer.

    Read more...

  • Smerdis Fuentes Ordained at Piedmont Park
    –

    Smerdis Fuentes, whose ministry focuses on helping young people find faith and belonging, was ordained Aug. 15, 2026, at Piedmont Park Church in Lincoln, Nebraska. He serves there as associate pastor for youth and young adults. For Fuentes, listening is an important part of being a pastor. His ordination biography describes a desire to walk alongside people through every season of life, especially young people wrestling with questions of identity, faith and purpose. He knows what it means to drift from God. Raised in Miami by his Cuban mother, Fuentes grew up with her example of faith and sacrifice. As a young adult, he stepped away from that faith. An encounter with Jesus at age 21 changed the direction of his life and led him toward pastoral ministry. At his ordination, Pastor Michael Halfhill delivered a message titled “What God Sees.” Virgil Covel’s charge called Fuentes to care tenderly for those entrusted to him and to teach plainly enough for children to understand. Fuentes earned a bachelor’s degree in biblical pastoral theology from Antillean Adventist University in 2017 and a Master of Divinity from Andrews University in 2021. His graduate studies included chaplaincy and youth and young adult ministry. Fuentes began ministry in Grand Island in August 2021, one month after marrying his wife, Ilka Judit. Together they share a commitment to creating welcoming spaces where people can grow spiritually. The couple are expecting their first child in December 2026.

    Read more...

Blogs

  • The Words Already Existed Glass Children — Part 12
    –

    The playground gave me a few things which were life-changing. My classes gave me more. I was a social work major by then, sitting in lectures that were not about me and recognizing myself in them anyway. Three times that year a concept came up, and I understood somewhere around the second sentence that it was describing my own life — and that it had been describing my own life for seventeen years while I had no word for it at all. Grief with no funeral I did not expect grief to apply to me. Nobody had died. But I had lost a brother — the one I imagined before he came home, and never met. The one I had hoped for years he would become if I just tried hard enough. We were not going to play the way other siblings play. We were not going to move through a life side by side: school, leaving home, marrying, raising children, growing old as two people who had started out together. I had been carrying this sadness since not long after he was born. When there is a death, the grief has a rough trajectory it usually takes, learning to live with the loss a little more year by year. Ambiguous grief does not. It arrives new again at every stage of life I reach and he does not, and it is not finished. It is not going to be finished. This is a type of grief often recognized in parents of a child with high needs, but typically not given much thought in their siblings. It should have been me Survivor’s guilt arrived in my vocabulary during a class. This type of guilt happens in many situations, such as an accident where some died or were hurt much worse than others. The thought running through my mind since early childhood was, It should have been me. I was not a perfect person. I deserved his fate. Why did I get the working body? Why am I the one who grew up and left home and married and raised children? Why was I able to have a career? Why am I the one who is okay? And I was acutely aware of something that never stopped seeming unfair. My own birth was the dangerous one. It was so difficult that the doctor was afraid my mother and I would both die. Rick’s delivery went more smoothly than mine — and he was the one who came out with damage. Since survivor’s guilt is often reopened at every stage, it never entirely resolves. But having a name for it is helpful. You cannot examine what you have no word for. With therapy and time, it is not as strong. Enmeshment, but how does that fit? The third concept I discovered was enmeshment. It was presented the way it usually is: as a marker of a dysfunctional family. Usually that family is one where one or more members are making bad choices — drinking too much, say — which affect the others negatively and cause the whole family to adopt unhealthy ways of coping in order to survive. Ours was not exactly the dysfunction the book was teaching. Yet I recognized my household, and had to work out for myself what the textbook did not say. The clearest look I ever got at how enmeshment affected me came when my family moved across the country and I stayed behind for school. They were a long way off and there was nothing for me to do. His appointments, his crises, whatever went wrong — all of it was going to be handled by two people without me. That should have been a relief. I was twenty years old and free. What I felt instead was that I could not put the responsibility down. Not missing them, not worrying in the ordinary way a person worries about family far away. A job I had held since I was three was still running inside me, and now there was no way to do it and no easy way to set it down either. You cannot see a system like that while you are in it, doing your part. You find out how fused you were when you are taken out of it — torn out of it, more like. He names and He heals He heals the brokenhearted and binds up their wounds. He determines the number of the stars and calls them each by name. (Psalm 147:3-4) Healing in one breath, naming in the next. Naming is part of the binding up. Nothing in my life changed on the days I learned those three concepts. My brother was still disabled, the grief still arrived at every milestone, and I still could not fix any of it. What changed is that I could look at what I was carrying, because it finally had a definition. If you have carried something for years with no words for it, it very likely has words. Somebody has likely studied it, written about it and given it a name. You are not the first, and you are not strange. Go and find out what it is called. Lord, You name the stars and You bind up the brokenhearted, and we have only just worked out that those are the same mercy. Give us words for what we carry, and someone to say them to. Amen. Next time: what I would tell parents now. Click HERE for the first article in this series.

    Read more...

  • A Tale of Two Epistles Which Letter Do You Write First?
    –

      Paul had a problem in Colossae: teachings that made Christ smaller. Now for the complication. When we hear “house church,” we picture a living room. Three bedrooms, two baths, folding chairs. A Roman household was something else. A wealthy man’s home was often a villa — several buildings around a courtyard, family, clients, servants, and slaves all under one roof and one master. The church at Colossae met in such a household. It belonged to a man named Philemon. Paul had never been to Colossae. But he knew Philemon. Wealthy men traveled the empire, and Paul had covered much of Asia Minor on foot. Somewhere their roads crossed, and Philemon came to faith through Paul. Paul says so, gently but plainly: “you owe me even your own self” (Philemon 19). So far, simple. Paul writes to the church in his friend’s house. Except for Onesimus. Onesimus, the runaway slave, stood next to Paul in Rome. And Onesimus was Philemon’s slave. He had run from the very household that was the destination of the two letters. It may be he stole something on the way out — Paul hints at that. He made for Rome, as many runaways did. The busy roads on the way and a city of a million people provided easy cover for a fugitive. Somewhere in that crowd, God brought Onesimus and Paul together. The runaway became a believer and then a constant companion, bringing food, running errands, seeing to the needs of a man in chains. A prisoner under guard paid his own way, and depended on friends to care for him. Now put yourself in Paul’s place. You must write to a church that meets in Philemon’s house. That letter will be read aloud in Philemon’s courtyard, with Philemon—and everyone else—listening. And the man who ran away from that courtyard stands next to you, holding your cup. You cannot write that letter and say nothing about Onesimus. And this involved more than just social awkwardness. Rome’s economy ran on slaves, so Rome took runaways seriously. A runaway might be beaten, branded, or even crucified. Roman law left the choice to the master. Philemon, and he alone, would settle what happened to Onesimus. So Paul has two letters to write. One to save a church from error. One to save a man’s life. Which do you write first? We can’t prove the order. Neither letter hints at which Paul wrote first. We do know that both letters went out together, and both name the same people around Paul. Weighing theology with long-term effects versus a fellow-believer under imminent threat, I’d write the one about Onesimus. I’d want to do everything I could to see that Philemon received him gently. Whatever the order, Paul wrote to Philemon. It is one of the most personal, one of the most vulnerable of all Paul’s letters we have. In that letter he had done something the modern reader passes over, but the Roman world could not miss. When Paul finished the letter, he handed it to Onesimus.

    Read more...

  • Dare To Be A Daniel Faith & Discipline
    –

    https://youtube.com/shorts/JlDlVhIWYWs?si=BCxxZByLeJkNaX32

    Read more...

  • A Tale of Two Epistles II A Strange Mixture: Two Errors, One Effect.
    –

    Paul had two problems from the same place. Epaphras brought the first. He had walked and sailed some 1,300 miles, from the Lycus Valley in Phrygia to Rome, where Paul lived under guard. The Colossians had learned the gospel from Epaphras (Colossians 1:7), and he labored for the believers in nearby Laodicea and Hierapolis too. Now something had gone wrong in Colossae, and probably in its neighbors. He needed his mentor’s counsel. Two streams of teaching had flowed into the church from opposite directions. Jewish legalism provided a steady stream of influence. Keep the rules, observe the days, watch what you eat and what you touch. Small things could make you unclean, cost you God’s favor, imperil your salvation. Paul quotes its slogans: “Do not handle, Do not taste, Do not touch” (2:21). We’ve all know the siren song of legalism. “If only you would do this, God would find you more acceptable.” You’ve heard that refrain. So have I. The second stream flowed from Greek philosophy, and it sounded far more sophisticated. Paul warns against being taken “captive by philosophy and empty deceit” (2:8). Plato taught that every physical thing is a shadow of an ideal. The table in your kitchen is a poor copy of the perfect idea of a table. In the hands of his later followers, that became something darker. Matter is tainted. Bodies are tainted. We are tainted. Now apply that to Jesus. In his perfection, he could not really have had a body. He only seemed human. And it gets worse. If God is pure spirit and we are stuck in flesh, we can’t approach him directly. We need go-betweens, beings who are not God but are nearer to him than we are. Angels. So people began appealing to angels, then worshiping them (2:18). These two streams should never have mixed. The legalist cared deeply about rules for the body. The Platonist thought the body hardly mattered. Put their teachers in a room and they’d argue. But they didn’t need to agree. They only needed to push in the same direction. The legalist puts a barrier between Jesus and the believer: keep all the rules, or Jesus can’t help you. The Platonist builds a different one: Jesus is out of reach, and you’ll need angels to get to God anyway. Different obstacles, same result. They push Jesus far away from us, and put the responsibility to reach him on our shoulders. Our behavior becomes a larger factor, his sacrifice grows smaller. The gospel agrees that we could not reach God on our own, but it tells us Jesus came to us. The confluence of those two polluted streams drove Epaphras to Rome. Not a quarrel over a minor point. A slow shrinking of the center. Paul’s reply is blunt: “You have been filled in him” (2:10). Filled. Nothing missing. How he makes that case is the rest of this series. The same thing happens now. The errors change costumes every generation. Something gets added to Jesus, or something gets subtracted from him. Either way, our Savior ends up smaller. But Epaphras was not the only man in Rome from Colossae. Paul calls him “one of you” (4:12). He uses the same words for someone else (4:9). Believers there met in a particular house. The man who owned it had a runaway slave. Epaphras may well have recognized him. Standing next to Paul.

    Read more...

Featured Stories